Page 7 - GAPP Newsletter Issue 1 Jan2019
P. 7

Technical Annex 1 to overall guidance: authorisation of changes in donation, procurement
       WP6      and collection, processing, preservation, storage and distribution (including labelling and

                package inserts): WP 6 is a very technical WP which involves a consistent list of associated and
                collaborating partners. It covers the overall duration of the action. The work of this WP is di-
                vided in two parts: Part 1 will develop definition of the critical characteristics/properties (crite-
                ria) for each category of blood component, tissue or cell type (referring to EU blood legislation
                2004/33/EU, EDQM) blood component monograph and T&C guide.
                Part 2 will develop a Guidance on the assessment of methods to demonstrate achievement/
                maintenance of the critical characteristics/properties for each category of SoHO, in particular
                where changes are proposed/implemented in one of the preparation steps.


                Technical Annex 2 to overall guidance: assessing the quality and safety of donor testing, mi-
       WP7      crobial inactivation and sterilisation steps as part of PPA (ABM, France; FIMEA, Finland): This

                WP focuses on those technical aspects of processing that aim to reduce the risk of microbial
                contamination, in particular: donor testing, microbial inactivation during processing, steriliza-
                tion of final products. The Technical Annex produced by this WP will include an assessment
                for four kinds of biological products: blood (and blood-derived products), tissues and cells for
                replacement, haematopoietic stem cells, reproductive tissues and cells. A technical group will
                define the shape of the document in order to harmonise whenever possible the text. Three
                Technical Meetings will be organised and the work will be also conducted  via teleconferences.
                Council of Europe is involved in the work of the WP and also ESHRE was invited as collaborat-
                ing experts.


                 Technical Annex 3 to overall guidance: assessing clinical data as part of PPA authorisation
       WP8       (FIMEA, Finland and BST, Spain): WP 8 aims at introducing systematic methodologies for the

                 evaluation of clinical (and technical) data, as part of the authorisation of processing activities.
                 The content of previous project will be taken into account by WP 8. This workpackage aims to
                 achieve common practices and systematic methodologies for the evaluation of clinical (and
                 technical) data as part of the authorisation of processing activities. It was agreed that the first
                 Technical Meeting will be organised jointly with other WPs.


                 Knowledge sharing on PPA between EU CAs (PEI, Germany): Dorothea Stahl presented WP9

       WP9       on behalf of PEI. PEI is responsible for the authorisation of biomedicine, tissue preparation,
                 tissue engineering and transfusion medicine.
                 The aim of this WP is to lay the grounds for a future implementation of the criteria catalogue
                 resulting from WP 6-8 to allow for a standardised, electronically supported assessment of
                 quality, safety and efficacy of blood, cells and tissues, in the case of state-of-the-art process-
                 ing procedures as well as in the case of innovative processing procedures.



         We strongly encourage anyone to upload the leaflet onto your


          organisation’s website along with the GAPP logo and a link to

                                       our Joint Action’s website.



       “This newsletter is part of the joint action ‘785269/GAPP’ which has received funding from the European Union’s Health Programme (2014-  GAPP - Newsletter 1  7
       2020). The content of this New-sletter represents the views of the author only and is his/her sole responsibility; it cannot be considered to
       reflect the views of the European Commission and/or the Consu-mers, Health, Agriculture and Food Executive Agency or any other body of
       the European Union. The European Commission and the Agency do not accept any responsibility for use that may be made of the informa-
       tion it contains”.
   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12